Once Removed, Twice Shy

January 19, 2013 at 7:15 am 4 comments

Family relations are hard.

A man is holding a photograph of another man and says, “Brothers and sisters I  have none, but this man’s father is my father’s son.” Who is the man in the photo?

But you don’t need riddles to make confusing situations. Real life is difficult enough.

When Lynne Cheney was doing genealogy research for Blue Skies, No Fences, a memoir about growing up in Wyoming, she discovered an interesting tidbit: Barack Obama and Dick Cheney are cousins. In particular, both are descendants of Mareen Duvall, a Huguenot who immigrated from France and settled in Anne Arundel County, Maryland.

Based on her homework, Lynne Cheney claimed that they were eighth cousins. The Chicago Sun-Times, however, reported that they were ninth cousins once removed.

If either Cheney or the Sun-Times got it wrong, well, who could blame them? This whole business of nth cousins p times removed is a bit overwhelming.

The holiday season is a good time to review the rules for consanguinity. (Consanguinity, from the Latin consanguinitas, means “blood relation.” The first two syllables lead to the modern term cousin.) At holiday gatherings, it is not uncommon for discussions like the following to occur:

“Hey, who was that on the phone?”

“That was Johnny. You remember him, Uncle Lenny’s brother’s kid?”

“Oh, yeah! What is he, my third cousin?”

“No. He’s your second cousin.”

“Actually, he’s your first cousin once removed.”

“No, he’s not! He’s your great nephew!”

“????????”

It wasn’t until a recent family gathering that I realized (a) I ought to learn these rules about consanguinity so I could avoid these ridiculous conversations and (b) there’s got to be a simple mathematical formula to figure out the relationship between two people.

As it turns out, once I found the solution to (b), then (a) was pretty easy.

Figuring out the relationship between two people can be accomplished with the following algorithm.

  1. Make an ascent list for each person. An ascent list is a list of ancestors proceeding from each person to their parents, to their grandparents, to their great-grandparents, and so on.
  2. Determine the first ancestor common to both ascent lists.
  3. Express the common ancestor in the form GxP and GyP for each person. Then, the two people are nth cousins p times removed, based on the following:
    R(x,y) = \min(x,y), |x-y| = n, p

Some notes about this algorithm:

  • The values of x and y depend on how many G’s appear in the relationship. For instance, a grandparent would be G1P, but a great-great-great-grandparent would be G4P.
  • The algorithm works for x = 0 or y = 0, either of which would indicate a parent.
  • If n = 0, the relationship between the two people is sibling (p = 0), niece/nephew (p = 1), great niece/nephew (p = 2), and so on.

As an example, let’s say that you and Johnny are trying to figure out how you’re related. Your great-great-grandmother (G3P) is Johnny’s grandmother (G1P), so x = 3 and y = 1. Then

n = \min(3, 1) = 1

and

p = |3 - 1| = 2

which means that Johnny is your first cousin twice removed.

According to geni.com, Barack Obama is the 9th great grandson of Mareen Duvall and Dick Cheney is the 8th great grandson of Mareen Duvall. If that’s correct, then x = 9, y = 8, and Obama and Cheney are eighth cousins once removed.

And if that’s the case, then neither the Chicago Sun-Times nor Lynne Cheney got it correct. (See, I told you this sh*t was hard.)

If you really want to geek out on the mathematics of consanguinity, check out http://www.knotsystem.dk/TheKnotSystem.pdf.

Entry filed under: Uncategorized. Tags: , , , , , , , .

MJ4MF Featured in MTaP 58 SAT, Wonderlic, and GPA

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. xhenderson  |  January 21, 2013 at 3:47 pm

    Nifty. You’ve tackled American style Eskimo kinship terminology! Now, for some real fun, try they Omaha system, or the mess they use in the Sudan. 😛

    Reply
  • 2. Sergio D. Holmes  |  January 26, 2013 at 6:14 am

    Why are so many guitarists jokes one liners? So the rest of the band can understand them.

    Reply
  • 3. idebenone  |  January 30, 2013 at 2:17 pm

    Why would it be bad for first cousins to produce children? They increases the risk of birth defects 1-2%. With current technology in the genetic sciences it’s possible to do a complete ‘workup’ on every possible defect that can occur and act accordingly. The reality is that first cousins (who can legally marry here) are much more likely to test for genetic markers that indicate potential birth defects or illnesses than non-cousins, thereby reducing the “cousin offspring” birth defects significantly, maybe even less that the “non-cousin” population.What’s also interesting is that no-one objects to ethnically close persons having sex or producing offspring, yet we know that within certain ethnic groups the risk of certain diseases is a lot higher than within other ethnic groups and that “inter-breeding” with other ethnic groups is the only way to “cure” thesediseases. In some cases, the ethnic group is the only source of the disease.The jokes reveal an ignorance of genetics, a sense of contempt, and an apparent moral outrage that has no basis. I I suppose ‘they’ “breed” while ‘we’ “make love”. Marrying cousins is “inbred”. “redneck”, “rural”, “gross”, “sick”, etc. Yet I still haven’t heard anyone express a negative opinion of that “inbred” Albert Einstein who married his first cousin and was the offspring of two first cousins. So I’m curious, and would like to run a little “test”:If you have any objections to cousins having sex (that seems to be the actual issue):1) At what depth of “cousins” (4th, 5th, 6th, 10th, 20th, 30th, …) would you no longer object? That means you pick a number and everyone closer than that number is ‘bad’ and everyone with that number or higher is ‘good’.2) Why do you object? Is is Scientific? Moral (Biblical?)? What reasons do you have for your objection?

    Reply
  • […] The following message appeared in my spam folder, submitted in response to a post about the math of cousins: […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About MJ4MF

The Math Jokes 4 Mathy Folks blog is an online extension to the book Math Jokes 4 Mathy Folks. The blog contains jokes submitted by readers, new jokes discovered by the author, details about speaking appearances and workshops, and other random bits of information that might be interesting to the strange folks who like math jokes.

MJ4MF (offline version)

Math Jokes 4 Mathy Folks is available from Amazon, Borders, Barnes & Noble, NCTM, Robert D. Reed Publishers, and other purveyors of exceptional literature.

Past Posts

January 2013
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Enter your email address to subscribe to the MJ4MF blog and receive new posts via email.

Join 232 other followers

Visitor Locations

free counters

%d bloggers like this: